Legal Opinion
Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Cottrell
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 25, 1976No. 74-1148PublishedCited by 225 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brennan
Section 11 of Mississippi’s Regulation Governing the Production and Sale of Milk and Milk Products in Mississippi, promulgated by the Mississippi State Board of Health (1967), provides, among other things, that “[m]ilk and milk products from . . . [another State] may be sold in . . . Mississippi. . . provided . . . that the regulatory agency [of the other State that] has jurisdiction accepts Grade A milk and milk products produced and processed in Mississippi on a reciprocal basis.” The question presented by this case is whether Mississippi, consistently with the Commerce Clause, Art. I, § 8,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Cooley v. Board of Wardens of Port of Philadelphia Ex Rel. Soc. for Relief of Distressed PilotsSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Huron Portland Cement Co. v. City of DetroitSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Baldwin v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc. v. Du MondSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by225 opinions
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- NORTH STAR INTERNATIONAL, a Nevada Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- City of Philadelphia v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Edgar v. Mite Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- New Energy Co. of Indiana v. LimbachSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
220 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.