Legal Opinion

City of Los Angeles v. Schweitzer

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 19, 1962No. Civ. 25243PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRAMPTON, J. pro tem. *

Appellant in her opening brief states: “This appeal concerns the constitutionality, construction of, and application of 1242.5 of the Code of Civil Procedure. ...” The notice of appeal, dated and filed August 10, 1960, states: “Please Take Notice that defendant herein appeals from that ‘Amended Order Granting Permission to En'ter, Survey and Explore Land’ dated July 18, 1960.”

The background of the litigation is as follows: Respondent city of Los Angeles is a charter city and as such has the power of eminent domain. Such city was in need of a reservoir site. On June 16,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Trede v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Efron v. KalmanovitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Sherman v. Standard Mines Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Olmstead v. WestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Rossi v. CaireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Powers v. City of RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Knoff v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. People v. Mario C.California Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. Caruso v. Snap-Tite, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Powers v. City of RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API