Olmstead v. West
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, J.
The plaintiffs brought this action to specifically enforce the provisions of a written option to purchase real estate allegedly exercised by them. The trial court found in favor of the plaintiffs’ contention and entered an interlocutory judgment which directed the defendant, within a specified time, to execute a good and sufficient deed conveying to plaintiffs the fee title to certain real property; to cause said deed to be placed in a designated escrow; and to furnish plaintiffs with a policy of title insurance showing title to said property to be vested in defendant free and clear of all…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Estate of Hanley v. HanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Lyon v. GossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Texas Co. v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Phillips v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Collins v. CorseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. KetchelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Efron v. KalmanovitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Woodman v. AckermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Lemaire v. All City Employees Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1973
- Chapman v. TarentolaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.