Legal Opinion

Olmstead v. West

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 4, 1960No. Civ. 6252PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, J.

The plaintiffs brought this action to specifically enforce the provisions of a written option to purchase real estate allegedly exercised by them. The trial court found in favor of the plaintiffs’ contention and entered an interlocutory judgment which directed the defendant, within a specified time, to execute a good and sufficient deed conveying to plaintiffs the fee title to certain real property; to cause said deed to be placed in a designated escrow; and to furnish plaintiffs with a policy of title insurance showing title to said property to be vested in defendant free and clear of all…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Estate of Hanley v. HanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Lyon v. GossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Texas Co. v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Phillips v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Collins v. CorseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. KetchelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Efron v. KalmanovitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Woodman v. AckermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Lemaire v. All City Employees Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. Chapman v. TarentolaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API