Legal Opinion
Travelers Insurance v. Byers
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 13, 1932No. Docket No. 934PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCOVEL, J., pro tem.
On June 7, 1928, James C. Byers signed an application for an insurance policy in the Travelers Insurance Company, the appellant herein. The application was in the usual form and contained the following questions, answers and statements by Mr. Byers:
“17. Have you within the past 5 years suffered any mental disease or infirmity or any bodily disease or infirmity ? A. No.
“18. Have you within the past 5 years received medical advice or attention? A. No. Surgical advice or attention? A. No. . . .
“20. Are you now in good health? A. Yes.”
The application was taken by an agent of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Truett v. OnderdonkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- French v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
- Meyer v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1895
- Whitney v. West Coast Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- O'Connor v. Grand Lodge of Ancient Order of United WorkmenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Ransom v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Fuentes v. TuckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Cohen v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Telford v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Pierre v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.