Legal Opinion

Galbraith Engineering Consultants, Inc. v. Pochucha

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 2009No. 07-1051PublishedCited by 301 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Medina

Section 33.004(e) of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code purports to revive claims otherwise “barred by limitations” under certain limited circumstances. The issue in this summary judgment appeal is whether this statute applies to revive a claim otherwise barred by a statute of repose, as distinguished from a statute of limitations. The court of appeals concluded that the statute was capable of reviving claims barred by either statutes of limitations or statutes of repose. 243 S.W.3d 138, 141. We conclude that the Legislature did not intend for this statute to revive claims extinguished by a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. City of Rockwall v. HughesTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Ryland Group, Inc. v. HoodTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Johnson v. City of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Alex Sheshunoff Management Services, L.P. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Trinity River Authority v. URS Consultants, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by301 opinions

  1. Texas Lottery Commission v. First State Bank of DeQueenTexas Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Molinet v. KimbrellTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Prairie View A&M University v. Diljit K. ChathaTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Fort Worth Transp. Auth. v. RodriguezTexas Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Stockton Ex Rel. Stockton v. OffenbachTexas Supreme Court · 2011

296 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API