Fort Worth Transp. Auth. v. Rodriguez
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
A. Statutory Construction
In construing statutes, our primary objective is to give effect to the Legislature's intent. Tex. Lottery Comm'n v. First State Bank of DeQueen , 325 S.W.3d 628, 635 (Tex. 2010) (citing Galbraith Eng'g Consultants, Inc. v. Pochucha , 290 S.W.3d 863, 867 (Tex. 2009) ). We rely on the plain meaning of the text as expressing legislative intent unless a different meaning is supplied by legislative definition or is apparent from the context, or the plain meaning leads to absurd results. Id. (citing City of Rockwall v. Hughes , 246 S.W.3d 621, 625-26 (Tex. 2008) ). A…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission v. IT-DavyTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- City of Rockwall v. HughesTexas Supreme Court · 2008
- Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co. v. MayesTexas Supreme Court · 2007
- Helena Chemical Co. v. WilkinsTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Tooke v. City of MexiaTexas Supreme Court · 2006
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by178 opinions
- Mark Silguero and Amy Wolfe v. Csl Plasma, IncorporatedTexas Supreme Court · 2019
- Rosenberg Development Corporation v. Imperial Performing Arts, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2019
- Hays Street Bridge Restoration Group v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 2019
- Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital of Denton, Marc Wilson, M.D., and Alliance ob/gyn Specialists, Pllc D/B/A ob/gyn Specialists, Pllc v. D.A. and M.A., Individually and as Next Friends of A.A., a MinorTexas Supreme Court · 2018
- Tarrant County, Texas v. Roderick Lydell BonnerTexas Supreme Court · 2019
173 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.