Legal Opinion

Jacob's Air Conditioning & Heating v. Associated Heating & Air Conditioning

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 22, 1987No. 3212PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERCONE, Judge:

The issue before this court is whether the trial court properly denied appellant leave to file an amended complaint after the statute of limitations had run on the underlying action. We hold that the trial court did err in not permitting the amended complaint.

Appellant, Jacob’s Air Conditioning and Heating, commenced this action by filing a summons on November 14, 1984, followed by the filing of a complaint on May 21, 1985 against appellee, Associated Heating and Air Conditioning, for amounts due in connection with appellant’s alleged sale of services and materials regarding…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Spain v. VicenteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Waugh v. Steelton Taxicab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. Fretts v. PavettiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Cianchetti v. KaylenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Wicker v. EspositoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. In re Activision Blizzard, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Debbs v. Chrysler Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Tork-Hiis v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Ferraro v. McCarthy-PascuzzoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Zercher v. Coca-Cola USASuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API