Tork-Hiis v. Commonwealth
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FLAHERTY, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal by allowance from an en banc judgment of the commonwealth court, which reversed the judgment of the trial court and expressly overruled its own precedent. The issue is whether a complaint against the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in a tort action for damages may be amended to substitute a commonwealth agency or employee after the statute of limitations has run.
Inge and Andres Tork arrived at Promised Land State Park and signed out in the park log before going cross-country skiing on January 25, 1994. They did not return to sign back…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Paulish v. BakaitisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Specter v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Gozdonovic v. Pleasant Hills Realty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Powell v. SutliffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Jacob's Air Conditioning & Heating v. Associated Heating & Air ConditioningSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Farina v. Nokia, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- In re Activision Blizzard, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Kincy v. PetroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Finn v. RendellCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- A.J. Russo v. Allegheny County, and the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, PA, Criminal DivisionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.