Waugh v. Steelton Taxicab Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Musmanno,
The plaintiff, who was injured while riding in a taxicab owned by a “Steelton Taxicab Company”, brought a suit in trespass against the said Steelton Taxicab Company, designating it as a corporation, only to find, after the statute of limitations had run, that the said taxicab “company” was not a corporation but a fictitious name used by Anthony John Kosir in the conduct of his taxicab business.
The plaintiff then obtained a rule on Kosir to show cause why the complaint should not be amended, to substitute as defendant, instead of the designation originally…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wright v. Eureka Tempered Copper Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
- Gozdonovic v. Pleasant Hills Realty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- McGinnis v. Valvoline Oil Works, Ltd.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- Miller, Admrx. v. Jacobs, Admrx.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
3Cited by45 opinions
- Paulish v. BakaitisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Powell v. SutliffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Fretts v. PavettiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Downes v. HODINSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Jacob's Air Conditioning & Heating v. Associated Heating & Air ConditioningSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.