Salvatierra v. National Indemnity Co.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Chief Judge.
The determinative issue here is whether the trial court erred in not allowing National Indemnity Company to intervene in the lawsuit filed by appellees against its insured.
Sol Behar and Daniel Singer operated a barbershop, The Esquire for Men, Inc. They were also the sole stockholders of a separate corporation, Esquire Labs of Arizona, Inc., that was in the business of performing artificial hair transplants. The two businesses were at separate locations. All the hair implants were done at the lab by lab employees supervised by licensed physicians. The barbershop…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Damron v. SledgeArizona Supreme Court · 1969
- Kepner v. Western Fire Insurance CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1973
- Seaboard Industries, Inc. v. MonacoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Granite State Insurance v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Rachel Sussman v. American Surety Company of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Corp. v. Advance Roofing & Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
- Dickman Aviation Services, Inc. v. United States Fire Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- Rocha v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- Purvis v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. HaysCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.