Seaboard Industries, Inc. v. Monaco
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
Appellant contends that the lower court erred in dissolving appellant’s writs of execution against appellee insurers because appellees breached their duty to defend the insured. 1 We disagree and, therefore, affirm the lower court.
This appeal arises from a garnishment proceeding in which appellant, Seaboard Industries, Inc. (“Seaboard”), a judgment creditor of Albert B. Monaco, caused writs of execution in attachment to be issued and named as garnishees Continental Casualty Company (“Continental”) and Insurance Company of North America (“I.N.A.”), appellees in the instant case.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brakeman v. Potomac Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Lee v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Gedeon v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Cadwallader v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Wilson v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- D'Auria v. Zurich InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. LinnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Biborosch v. Transamerica InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- American States Insurance v. Maryland Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- American Contract Bridge League v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.