MMI Products, Inc. v. Long
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MESSITTE, District Judge.
The Court considers Plaintiff MMI Products, Inc.’s Objection to Magistrate Judge Connelly’s Order of April 1, 2005 and Defendant Dale Long’s Opposition to same.1 The Magistrate Judge proposes to sanction MMI pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(g)(3), by ordering MMI and its counsel to pay the fees of Long’s expert because MMI and counsel failed to make reasonable inquiries into the reliability of their own expert’s report as incorporated by reference into MMI’s answers to interrogatories.
The Court SUSTAINS MMI’s objection.
I
The salient facts found by the Magistrate…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Phinney v. Wentworth Douglas HospitalCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Sexton v. Uniroyal Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Harris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- In re Diet DrugsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
3Cited by11 opinions
- Genger v. TR INVESTORS, LLCSupreme Court of Delaware · 2011
- Furmanite America, Inc. v. T.D. Williamson, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2007
- Sky Angel U.S., LLC v. Discovery Communications, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2014
- Neighborhood Development Collaborative v. MurphyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2005
- Chao v. Tyson Foods, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.