Legal Opinion

Sexton v. Uniroyal Chemical Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 8, 2003No. 01-5772PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff-Appellant, George Sexton (“Sexton”), has challenged the district court’s dismissal of his products liability claim, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b), against defendants-appellees, Uniroyal Chemical Company and R.T. Vanderbilt Company (collectively “Uniroyal,” or “Company”), for his failure to provide the required expert witness reports under the district court’s scheduling order and Fed. R.Civ.P. 26(a)(2)(B). The appellant has maintained that while he failed to comply with Rule 26(a) he, nevertheless, provided information through interrogatories regarding the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. William Harmon v. Csx Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  5. Joseph D. Little, D/B/A Little Marina v. Clayton Yeutter, Secretary, U.S. Department of Agriculture U.S. Forest Service F. Dale RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Laukus v. Rio Brands, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2013
  2. Baker Hughes Inc. v. S&S Chemical, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  3. Adell v. John Richards Homes Building Co. (In Re John Richards Homes Building Co.)District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
  4. MMI Products, Inc. v. LongDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2005
  5. Abrams v. MendsenDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API