Legal Opinion

United States v. Taylor

District Court, N.D. California

Decided August 24, 1988No. CR-88-0140 EFLPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

LYNCH, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Defendant Roosevelt Taylor, Jr. is being prosecuted pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1623 1 for six counts of perjury for making false declarations during testimony before a grand jury. One of the requirements for conviction under section 1623 2 is that such declarations be “material” to the grand jury proceeding in which they are made. The United States has moved for a determination by the court that the false declarations alleged in the indictment are material as a matter of law. Defendant opposes the motion primarily on the grounds that the issue…

2Cases cited88 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. United States v. Michael E. GaudinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  2. United States v. Sammy G. Daily and Frederik A. FiggeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  3. People v. HedgecockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. People v. KobrinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. United States v. Richard A. NazzaroCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API