Legal Opinion

United States v. Richard A. Nazzaro

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided January 16, 1990No. 89-1152PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SELYA, Circuit Judge.

It is with a sense of deja vu that we revisit a tawdry chapter in the annals of Massachusetts law enforcement known familiarly as “Examscam,” a network of alleged conspiracies aimed at purloining advance copies of civil service examinations and selling them to police officers so they could fraudulently obtain promotions. Earlier this year, we disposed of a group of appeals arising from the prosecution of nine gendarmes and a state legislative aide said to be mired in the muck of Examscam. See United States v. Doherty, 867 F.2d 47 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 109…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Grunewald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Marshall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Ristaino v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. United States v. BoylanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  2. Blinzler v. Marriott International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  3. United States v. Pedro v. SpedalieriCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Dale Scott HunnewellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. Dwayne A. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API