United States v. Sammy G. Daily and Frederik A. Figge
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLOWAY, Chief Judge.
Defendants-appellants Sammy Daily and Frederik Figge were convicted on one count each of conspiring, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, to commit offenses under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1001 and 1343. Daily and Figge make several claims of error. In view of our ultimate disposition of these appeals, we only deem it necessary or appropriate to address eight contentions here: (1) whether the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to impose judgment on Daily and Figge; (2) whether the indictment insufficiently charged the offense at issue, or was improperly broadened by the trial…
2Cases cited94 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by127 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. YousefCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- United States v. YousefCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Pamela Jones, Katresa Marie Johnson, Mark J. Scott, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Michael E. GaudinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
122 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.