Legal Opinion
Tuolumne County Deputy Sheriffs' Ass'n v. Board of Administration
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 26, 1989No. A040367PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LOW, P. J.
Deputized employees of the Tuolumne County Sheriff, restricted in their employment to supervising inmates and maintaining securi ty at the county’s jail, were granted a writ of mandate compelling the Public Employees’ Retirement System (PERS) to change their membership status from “miscellaneous” to “safety,” thereby making them eligible for increased benefits. We conclude the trial court erred in ruling that these employees met the statutory prerequisites for “safety” membership. Accordingly, we reverse.
The County of Tuolumne has contracted with PERS for retirement benefits…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Crumpler v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Merandette v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Estate of GibsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Schaeffer v. Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Davis v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
3Cited by6 opinions
- City of Huntington Beach v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- City of Martinez v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Riverside Sheriffs'assn. v. Bd. of Admin., Cal. Pub. Empl's'ret. Syst.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- United Public Employees, Local 790 v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- County of Mono v. Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.