Legal Opinion
County of Mono v. Public Employees' Retirement System
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 8, 1999No. C027742PublishedCited by 2 opinions
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DAVIS, J.
The basic issue here is whether Mono County’s Public Safety Officers (PSO’s) must be granted “local safety member” classification under Mono County’s contract with the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (PERS). As part of their duties, PSO’s supervise county jail inmates.
We conclude that the PSO’s are “safety members” of PERS. We therefore reverse the trial court’s determination.
Background
As authorized by statute, Mono County (Mono) has contracted with PERS for retirement benefits for county employees. (Gov. Code, former § 20450;
all future references to sections…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mansell v. Board of Administration of the Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Crumpler v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- City of Sacramento v. Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- City of Sacramento v. Public Employees Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Horsemen's Benevolent & Protective Ass'n v. Valley Racing Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- City of Oakland v. Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Metropolitan Water Dist. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002