Legal Opinion
Schaeffer v. Public Employees' Retirement System
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 31, 1988No. C002834PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SPARKS, J.
Joseph Oscar Schaeffer appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County denying his petition for a writ of administrative mandate. Appellant had sought an order requiring the respondent California Public Employees’ Retirement System (hereafter PERS) to reclassify him from “miscellaneous” to “safety” membership in PERS. Appellant contends that his employment as a correctional officer for Placer County was of such a nature that he is entitled to safety member status, that Placer County has concluded that he is a safety member since it grants to correctional…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Crumpler v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Neeley v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Boxx v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Ames v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
3Cited by10 opinions
- City of Huntington Beach v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- City of Oakland v. Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Biggers v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Riverside Sheriffs'assn. v. Bd. of Admin., Cal. Pub. Empl's'ret. Syst.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- Tuolumne County Deputy Sheriffs' Ass'n v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.