Legal Opinion

United Public Employees, Local 790 v. City of Oakland

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 5, 1994No. A063289PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PETERSON, P. J.

— Appellants, Claude Percy, Major Bell, James Lewis, and Greg Carter, are jailers at the Oakland city jail. They and their union contend the jailers are entitled to the special disability benefits, provided by Labor Code 1 section 4850, for city police officers and other city employees whose duties “clearly fall within the scope of active law enforcement service.” We agree with the trial court that jailers who work as custodians of prisoners do not have duties which “clearly fall” in the category of “active law enforcement service” for purposes of these benefits.

I. Facts…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Huntington Beach v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Kimball v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. Ames v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. Schaeffer v. Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. Tuolumne County Deputy Sheriffs' Ass'n v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pearl v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Biggers v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. Arbuckle-College City Fire Protection District v. County of ColusaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. Riverside Sheriffs'assn. v. Bd. of Admin., Cal. Pub. Empl's'ret. Syst.California Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. Pearl v. WCABCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API