Legal Opinion
Dadas v. Prescott, Ball & Turben
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided December 8, 1981No. C81-1150PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WHITE, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Lynne A. Dadas, alleges that she began working for defendant Prescott, Ball & Turben pursuant to a written contract of employment. During the course of her employment plaintiff became pregnant. She took a maternity leave but expected to return shortly after the birth of her baby. However when she attempted to return the defendant refused to rehire her. The plaintiff asserts that she has been discriminated against on the basis of her sex and that the defendant’s action is in derogation of plaintiff’s right to due process of law and equal…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Richard JOHNSON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GEORGIA HIGHWAY EXPRESS, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Richerson v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Henkel v. Educational Research Council of AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- DeGrace v. RumsfeldCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Phung v. Waste Management, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
- Shaner v. Horizon Bancorp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- Snell v. Suffolk CountyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1985
- Merkel v. Scovill, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1983
- Merkel v. Scovill, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.