Legal Opinion

King County v. HAROLD HIGH

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1950No. 31299PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrady, J.

King county instituted this action against respondents to enjoin them from conducting a commercial business upon property owned by them within the limits of an area established by its board of county commissioners as a first residence district. The answer to the complaint set forth an affirmative defense to the effect that the property in question was being used for business purposes at ■ the time of the adoption of the zoning resolution, and by reason of an exception contained in the zoning code, its inhibitions did not apply to the property. The court sustained the defense and dismissed the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Douglas v. Village of Melrose ParkIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Ullman, State's Attorney, Ex Rel. Eramo v. PayneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Andrew v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  2. High v. HighWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Skamania County v. WoodallCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  4. Skamania County v. WoodallCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  5. Choi v. City of FifeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API