Legal Opinion

Ullman, State's Attorney, Ex Rel. Eramo v. Payne

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 6, 1940PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.

This case involves the meaning of the word “discontinued” as used in the Meriden zoning ordinance. It was tried on an agreed statement of facts, adopted as the finding, which may be summarized as follows: A package store was conducted by Charles Malloy in the property at 123% West Main Street, Meriden, from June 30, 1936, to June 30, 1939. He then vacated the premises, taking with him his personal property except two side wall cases, used for keeping liquor on display for sale, which were pur chased by his landlord and his sign, containing his name together with the words “Liquor and Package…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Haller Baking Company's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Landay v. Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
  3. Town of Darien v. WebbSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  4. State ex rel. Schaetz v. MandersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Lehmaier v. WadsworthSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Defelice v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
  2. Fairlawns Cemetery Assn., Inc. v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  3. Point O'Woods Assn., Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  4. Essex Leasing, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  5. Friedson v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API