Legal Opinion
Andrew v. King County
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided October 16, 1978No. 5685-1PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Andersen, A.C.J.—
Facts of Case
On certiorari, the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County reversed the decision of the King County Board of Appeals and determined that the Raging River Quarry was not a legal nonconforming use permitted under the King County zoning code. The quarry owner appeals. We reverse and remand.
The Raging River Quarry, which is the subject of this action, is located adjacent to the Raging River and is between the towns of Preston and Fall City in a largely rural area of King County. A determination was made by an administrative department of King County…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Bianco v. Town of DarienSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Anderson v. Island CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- Helland v. King County Civil Service CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- Board of Zoning Adjustment v. BoykinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
- Hoke v. Stevens-Norton, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1962
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Barnes v. Board of Sup'rs, DeSoto CountyMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
- State Ex Rel. Lige & Wm. B. Dickson Co. v. County of PierceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
- Lejeune v. Clallam CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
- Van Sant v. City of EverettCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
- Chaussee v. Snohomish County CouncilCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.