Legal Opinion
State v. Municipality of Anchorage
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided February 15, 1991No. S-3456PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COMPTON, Justice.
The State of Alaska (state) appeals an order which denied Hanson’s motion for a new trial as to the Municipality of Anchorage (municipality), the state’s codefendant in the action, but granted it as to the state. The court then certified the judgment as to the municipality in accordance with Alaska Civil Rule 54(b). Only that judgment is before us. We affirm the judgment.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
LeRoy Hanson lost control of his bicycle while riding down a paved pathway in Anchorage in 1985, hit his head on a handrail alongside the pathway, and died as a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- City of Fairbanks v. NesbettAlaska Supreme Court · 1967
- Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc. v. DayAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
- Juneau Square Corp. v. First Wisconsin National Bank of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- Mertsaris v. 73rd Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Nell Williams v. John R. Slade, John S. SladeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- City of Fairbanks v. RiceAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- Fancyboy v. Alaska Village Electric Cooperative, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999
- Buffett v. VargasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
- Cizek v. Concerned Citizens of Eagle River Valley, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Cizek v. Concerned Citizens of Eagle River Valley, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.