Cizek v. Concerned Citizens of Eagle River Valley, Inc.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRYNER, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
The Cizeks appeal a superior court decision that enjoined their use of a parcel of land as an airstrip after the court held that the airstrip was not a continuing nonconforming use under Anchorage zoning laws. Because a nonconforming use of property is not maintained simply by the property's continual suitability for the use or by sporadic unauthorized use, we affirm the trial court's decision.
II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
This case centers on the history of a private airstrip in Eagle River. Harvey Pullen homesteaded a parcel of land in 1964 on which he built…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Kollodge v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
- Balough v. Fairbanks North Star BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- Buoy v. ERA Helicopters, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1989
- Reeves v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cizek v. Concerned Citizens of Eagle River Valley, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2003
- Griswold v. City of HomerAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Whah v. WhahAlaska Supreme Court · 2002