Legal Opinion

Cizek v. Concerned Citizens of Eagle River Valley, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 2002No. S-9574PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRYNER, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

The Cizeks appeal a superior court decision that enjoined their use of a parcel of land as an airstrip after the court held that the airstrip was not a continuing nonconforming use under Anchorage zoning laws. Because a nonconforming use of property is not maintained simply by the property's continual suitability for the use or by sporadic unauthorized use, we affirm the trial court's decision.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

This case centers on the history of a private airstrip in Eagle River. Harvey Pullen homesteaded a parcel of land in 1964 on which he built…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Kollodge v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Balough v. Fairbanks North Star BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Buoy v. ERA Helicopters, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Reeves v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cizek v. Concerned Citizens of Eagle River Valley, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Griswold v. City of HomerAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Whah v. WhahAlaska Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API