Legal Opinion

West v. Prater

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1937No. 6334PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAilshie, J.

In July, 1930, at the request of respondent, Harley Williams negotiated a deal for a second-hand bean huller, for which respondent was to pay the Advance-Rumely Thresher Co. $950, to be evidenced by two promissory notes. Respondent signed an order specifying “One S. H. Rumely Bean Huller complete; this machine second hand accepted present location, present condition.” Two promissory notes, each for $475, dated August 19, 1930, were executed by respondent, one due November 1, 1930, and the other November 1, 1931; the first one was paid “6-5-31” and was returned to respondent in a letter dated…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Upton v. TribilcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Kimmell v. SkellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Smith v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Milner v. Earl Fruit Co. of the NorthwestIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Widincamp v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Irwin Rogers Insurance Agency, Inc. v. MurphyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Mohar v. McLelland Lumber CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Scogings v. LoveIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
  4. C. I. T. Corporation v. ElliottIdaho Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Petersen v. HollandIdaho Supreme Court · 1957

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API