Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Camhi & Undergarment & Negligee Workers Union, Local 62
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 23, 1961PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order entered on January 6, 1961 denying petitioner’s motion to stay arbitration under a collective bargaining agreement, reversed, on the law, without costs to either party, and the motion granted. The issue in this ease is not whether petitioner is bound by the arbitration clause in the collective bargaining agreement but whether the issue tendered for arbitration falls within the scope of the agreement and the arbitration clause contained in it. Concededly, and as confirmed by the stipulation of facts, petitioner ceased to be a member of the partnership in March, 1959, and has since…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Matter of Lipman (Haeuser Shellac Co.)New York Court of Appeals · 1942
- In re the Arbitration between Spectrum Fabrics Corp. & Main Street Fashions, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- In Re the Arbitration Between Bullard & Morgan H. Grace Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
- In re the Arbitration between Spectrum Fabrics Corp. & Main Street Fashions, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1955
- In Re the Arbitration Between Belding Heminway Co. & Wholesale & Warehouse Workers' Union, Local 65, C.I.O.New York Court of Appeals · 1946
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hartford Financial Systems, Inc. v. Florida Software Services, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 1982
- Wisnouse v. TelseyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- Ferreri v. First Options of Chicago, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
- Keller Construction Co. v. KashaniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- London, Anderson & Hoeft, Ltd. v. Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995