Legal Opinion

In Re the Arbitration Between Belding Heminway Co. & Wholesale & Warehouse Workers' Union, Local 65, C.I.O.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 23, 1946PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

Whether the appellant was bound to employ at its New Jersey plant members of the respondent union was a debatable question which called for a decision as to the scope of the collective bargaining agreement between the parties. This question, we think, was for the court, not for the arbitrators. (Matter of Bullard v. Grace Co., 240 N. Y. 388, 395.) The orders should be reversed and the matter remitted to Special Term for decision of the preliminary issue above stated.

The orders should be reversed and the matter remitted to the Special Term for further proceedings in accordance with this…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re the Arbitration Between Bullard & Morgan H. Grace Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1925

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Colt's Industrial Union v. Colt's Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
  2. MacH. Printers, Etc., US v. Merrill, Etc., WorksNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  3. In re BergerNew York Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Brampton Woolen Co. v. Local Union 112Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1948
  5. In re the Arbitration between B. F. Curry, Inc. & ReddeckNew York Supreme Court · 1949

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API