Legal Opinion

London, Anderson & Hoeft, Ltd. v. Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 25, 1995No. C6-94-2233Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

‘ MARTIN J. MANSUR, Judge.

Ronald S. London, Laurence A. Anderson, and Donald L. Hoeft (the shareholders) are shareholders in the professional corporation of London, Anderson & Hoeft, Ltd. (the professional corporation). Along with the pro fessional corporation, they brought a declaratory judgment action to establish the extent of their personal liability under the professional corporation’s legal malpractice insurance policy. Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Company (MLM), the professional corporation’s malpractice insurance carrier, counterclaimed, alleging the shareholders were individually…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Henning Nelson Construction Co. v. Fireman's Fund American Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Bobich v. OjaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  4. A.Y. McDonald Industries, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
  5. Victoria Elevator Co. of Minneapolis v. Meriden Grain Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API