Trenton Industries v. A. E. Peterson Manufacturing Co.
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
HOLTZOFF, District Judge.
This is the trial of an action to recover compensation for the use of a patented invention involving an improvement in high chairs intended for the use of infants. The complaint in its present form consists of two counts. The first count asserts a claim for infringement of the patent, and is in the customary form of complaints in patent infringement suits. The second count sounds in quasi-contract and seeks to recover compensation for the use of the patented device during the period prior to the issuance of the patent.
This claim is based on the contention that the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Atlantic Works v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Hoeltke v. C. M. Kemp Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1936
- Dean A. Lyon v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Vantage Point, Inc. v. Parker Bros., Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1981
- Stutz Motor Car of America, Inc. v. Reebok International, Ltd.District Court, C.D. California · 1995
- Lockwood v. Langendorf United Bakeries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Schwinn Bicycle Company v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Monolith Portland Midwest Co. v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 1967
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.