Legal Opinion

Monolith Portland Midwest Co. v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided January 6, 1967No. Civ. 553-58-SPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

STEPHENS, District Judge.

This cause came on regularly for trial before the Honorable Albert Lee Stephens, Jr., Judge presiding, sitting without a jury. Oral and documentary evidence was introduced by the parties and after oral argument, the Court ordered the cause submitted.

JURISDICTION AND PARTIES

Federal jurisdiction is invoked on the ground of diversity of citizenship and an amount in controversy, exclusive of interest and costs, of more than $3,000.00. [This action was filed prior to the effective date of 28 U.S.C. § 1332(b), as amended July 25, 1958.] There is no…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Altvater v. FreemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours Powder Co. v. MaslandSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Hoeltke v. C. M. Kemp Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1936
  5. Electric Storage Battery Co. v. ShimadzuSupreme Court of the United States · 1939

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Monolith Portland Midwest Company, a Nevada Corporation v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  2. Purer & Company and Phillip Purer v. Aktiebolaget Addo and Addo MacHine Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  3. United States v. ReedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
  4. Maurice A. Garbell, Inc. v. Boeing CompanyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1973
  5. Monsanto Company v. Rohm and Haas CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1970

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API