Legal Opinion

Ruch v. Ruch

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1909No. Docket No. 41PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from St. Joseph; Yaple, J. Bill by Luther N. Ruch and William Ruch against Emma A. Ruch for the cancellation of a deed and the specific performance of a contract. From a decree for complainants, defendant appeals. Complainants are the children and sole heirs at law of Amos A. and Rosealtha Ruch, both deceased. Amos and Rosealtha were married in 1870. March 22, 1879, Rosealtha bought the W. i of the N. E. ¿, sec. 4, town 8 S., range 12 W., containing 80 acres.

Read the full summary

Appeal from St. Joseph; Yaple, J. Bill by Luther N. Ruch and William Ruch against Emma A. Ruch for the cancellation of a deed and the specific performance of a contract. From a decree for complainants, defendant appeals. Complainants are the children and sole heirs at law of Amos A. and Rosealtha Ruch, both deceased. Amos and Rosealtha were married in 1870. March 22, 1879, Rosealtha bought the W. i of the N. E. ¿, sec. 4, town 8 S., range 12 W., containing 80 acres. The consideration was $5,000 which she paid with her own money. April 26, 1889, she conveyed to her husband the south half of…

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

(after stating the facts). The court found that Mr. Ruch’s first wife purchased the 80 acres with her own money; that the deed by her to her husband of the south 40 was without consideration; that the deed of the life estate was made upon consideration that their father would, upon his death, leave it to them; that defendant before her marriage had knowledge of that contract; that the deed and bill of sale by Amos to the de*233fendant were without consideration, and were received by her with full knowledge and notice of the contract between complainants and their father. The sole question of law…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Carmichael v. CarmichaelMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Stewart v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  3. Holland v. HoytMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Farwell v. JohnstonMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Laird v. LairdMichigan Supreme Court · 1897

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Rossman v. HutchinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Stotts v. StottsMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  3. In re Moon's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Peoples Savings Bank v. GeistertMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Sullivan v. TownsendArizona Supreme Court · 1926

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API