Holland v. Hoyt
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Saginaw Circuit. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Campbhlu J.
Hoyt sued Holland on promissory notes for $1000, to which the latter pleaded, and offered to show want of consideration. Having proved that they were given on an exchange of lands, the negotiation for which began with Hoyt and was also partially conducted with an agent, one C. B. Mott, the defendant beloAV then offered to prove the following state of facts: That Hoyt had verbally authorized Mott to negotiate for an exchange of lands, and a bargain was closed Avith him; that when it Avas closed Holland told Mott he was negotiating' a sale of the property coming to him, and, not…
2Cited by23 opinions
- Barton v. GrayMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Scott v. BushMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
- In re Williams' EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Love v. Kirkbride Drilling & Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. EnglishSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.