American Exchange National Bank v. Winder
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
The fundamental question is whether there is enough evidence to sustain the jury’s answer to the fourth issue; for if the appellant is estopped as against the plaintiff to assert title to the property in controversy only a few of the exceptions need be considered. The answer may be found in the doctrine of estoppel.
We are not concerned with estoppel by record or by writing, but with estoppel in pads — i. e., equitable estoppel. While equitable estoppels arise from facts which are matters in pais, there is an essential and marked distinction between them and legal estoppels in pais. The two…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dickerson v. ColgroveSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Boddie v. BondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Holmes v. CrowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
- Exum v. . CogdellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
3Cited by30 opinions
- Peek v. Wachovia Bank & Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Gore v. Myrtle/MuellerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
- State Highway Commission v. ThorntonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Gaston-Lincoln Transit, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Hawkins v. M & J FINANCE CORP.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.