American Cent. Ins. Co. v. Terry
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
LEVY, X
(after stating the facts as above). The principal and controlling question duly presented by appellant for review is that of whether or not the plea in bar of the action should have been sustained. It is conceded as a settled rule of law, set out in numerous cases, that where a policy of insurance provides, as in the present case, for the arbitration as to the amount of loss in the event of disagreement between the parties, and that no suit shall be brought upon such policy until such arbitration is had, such disagreement is prerequisite to the right to demand such arbitration, and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Scottish Union & National Insurance v. ClancyTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Hickerson & Co. v. Insurance CompaniesTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
- Manchester Fire Insurance v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896
- Milwaukee Mechanics' Ins. v. West Development Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Fidelity-Ph&338nix Fire Ins. v. MumawCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- American Central Ins. Co. v. TerryTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
- MLCSV10 v. Stateside Enterprises, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2012
- Gardner v. State Farm Lloyds, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002
- American Central Ins. Co. v. TerryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- In Re Allstate County Mutual Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.