Hickerson & Co. v. Insurance Companies
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM COFFEE. Appeal from Circuit Court of Coffee County. M. D. SmallhaN, J.
1Opinion of the CourtWilices, J.
Plaintiffs, L. D. Hickerson & Co., were insured against loss by lire in the three companies above named, the property insured being-lumber, upon a yard owned by them at Tullakoma, Tenn. The property having been destroyed by fire, suit was brought upon the policies. The causes were consolidated and heard before the Court and a *195jury, and a verdict was rendered against the companies separately, to Avit: Against the German - American Insurance Company for • $1,834.94; the Royal Insurance Co., $1,834.94; and the Equitable for $918.57, or a total of $4,588.45. The plaintiff remitted $34.94 each, as…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hamilton v. Liverpool, London & Globe InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Farnum v. Phoenix InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- McCullough v. Phœnix InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- Uhrig v. . Williamsburgh City Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Bishop v. Agricultural InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Providence Washington Insurance v. WolfIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. KirkpatrickTennessee Supreme Court · 1913
- Gulf Compress Co. v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
- Vernon Insurance v. MaitlenIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
- Shapiro v. Patrons' Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.