Malkamaki v. Sea Ray Boats, Inc.

OPINION AND ORDER

BOYKO, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Defendant Caterpillar, Inc.’s (“CAT”), Motion for Summary Judgment, Sea Ray Boats, Ine.’s (“Sea Ray”) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and MarineMax of Ohio, Inc.’s (“MarineMax”) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. For the following reasons, the Court grants in part and denies in part Caterpillar’s Motion for Summary judgment, grants in part and denies in part Defendants Sea Ray and Marine-Max’s Motions for Partial Summary Judgment.

FACTS

In August of 2001, Plaintiff Matt Malkamaki purchased a Sea Ray 540 Sundancer…