Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Eidlin

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 1, 1996No. C922705DR; CA A85652PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, P. J.

Husband appeals from a post-dissolution judgment that increased the amount of his spousal support obligation to wife and increased its duration from five years to an indefinite period. We modify the judgment to decrease the duration of that obligation to seven years and otherwise affirm.

On September 2, 1993, when their stipulated judgment of marital dissolution was entered, the parties were both 47 years old and had been married for 21 years. They have three children who were then ages 19, 16 and 13. The parties agreed to joint custody of the two younger children, who reside primarily with…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of Marriage of McDonnalOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. PorterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  3. In re the Marriage of BarronCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  4. In re the Marriage of HearnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  5. In re the Marriage of GradyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Toni v. ToniNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  2. In re the Marriage of HutchinsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  3. In re the Marriage of SauverCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  4. In re the Marriage of HalseyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  5. In re the Marriage of PollockCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API