Legal Opinion

Williams v. Silverstein

California Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1931No. Docket No. S.F. 14171PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

A hearing was granted herein in order that we might give further consideration to the questions at issue, after decision by the District Court of Appeal in and for the First Appellate District, Division One, Jorgensen, J., pro tern., writing the opinion. Upon such consideration we are satisfied that the reasoning and conclusions of the appellate tribunal were correct; that the signatures of the appellants on the back of the promissory notes sued upon constituted! them indorsers and not original makers or guarantors thereof; that the trial court was in error in the admission of oral…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hobson v. HassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Lindemann v. CoryellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  3. Citizens' Bank of Los Angeles v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Bean v. Pioneer Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Farmers' & Mechanics' Bank of Savings v. ColbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cadigan v. American Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
  2. Martinez v. MartinezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Nourse v. KovacevichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. Brunzell v. WoodburyNevada Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Cherry v. SharpSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API