Serr v. Biwabik Concrete Aggregate Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
1 Reported in 278 N.W. 355. Defendant appeals from an order denying its blended motion for judgment notwithstanding or new trial.
The facts viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiff may be summarized in this fashion: Defendant over a period of years had been engaged in operating a gravel plant near highway No. 35 between Aurora and Biwabik. In carrying on its work it had occasion to use horses. A few days prior to July 30, 1930, it had borrowed a horse from a near-by farmer and was using it with one of its own. Both animals were in its exclusive care and possession, the man in charge…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Doremus v. RootWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- McIsaac v. McMurraySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1915
- Richardson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Nygard v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Mix v. DowningSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Aronovitch v. LevySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Clancy v. PacentiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1957
- Caudill v. CHATHAM MANUFACTURING COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Cochrane v. Tudor Oaks Condominium ProjectCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Schmidt v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.