Legal Opinion
State v. Sanders
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided June 21, 2007No. CC 011137484; CA A122330; SC S53056PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.
This criminal case presents the issue whether a state statute mandating the collection of blood or buccal samples for purposes of DNA profiling from all persons convicted of felonies violates either the state or federal constitutional prohibitions against unreasonable searches and seizures. The Court of Appeals upheld a trial court order requiring the defendant to submit a blood or buccal sample as a condition of his probation. State v. Sanders, 202 Or App 672, 126 P3d 1260 (2005). For the reasons set out below, we affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals.
The operative facts are brief and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. KnightsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Samson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- United States v. Thomas Cameron KincadeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. KimlerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. CloutierOregon Supreme Court · 2011
- State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. M. A. D.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- State v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
- State v. HartmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- State v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.