Legal Opinion

Machado v. Machado

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 30, 1918No. Civ. No. 2375Published

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County. J. R. Welch, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

BEASLY, J., pro tem.

This action was begun in 1913; Plaintiff had judgment for divorce on the ground of cruelty, and included in the judgment also was a settlement of property rights, to which she objected, and she appealed from the latter part of the judgment and was granted a new trial of the issues regarding property. The superior court retried those issues and again adjusted the property rights of the parties. In this latter judgment it determined that what is known as the Guth ranch was separate property of the defendant, and what is known as the Alviso ranch was partly •separate and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Shay v. Chicago Clock Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Apprate v. FaureCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Pashgian v. StephensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API