Legal Opinion

State v. Martin

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1999No. 980129PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Justice:

¶ 1 This case comes to us on appeal from the conviction of Jeff Martin (“Martin”) on one count of aggravated kidnaping, one count of rape, and three counts of forcible sodomy. All of these charges arise out of an incident involving Lorraine Egan (“Egan”). Martin claims the trial court committed error by: (i) denying Martin’s motion for a new trial based on the discovery of new evidence; (ii) denying Martin’s pre-trial motion to discover the identity of the individual Egan alleged raped her previously; and (iii) sealing Egan’s mental health records before trial but after an…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. BoydUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. LooseUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. MartinUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. RainesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. State v. TarratsUtah Supreme Court · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API