Legal Opinion

State v. Raines

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 9, 2003No. WD 61366PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAROLD L. LOWENSTEIN, Judge.

This appeal requires this court to determine whether a criminal defendant charged with rape is entitled under the Confrontation Clause to cross-examine the putative victim about her alleged prior false allegations of rape solely to show that she has a propensity to lie. Appellant Raines, who was convicted of two counts of forcible rape, Section 566.030, RSMo. (1999), 1 and one count of assault in the second degree, Section 565.060, argues that he does have such a right and that the rape shield statute, Section 491.015, RSMo. (2000), does not prohibit his inquiry…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Olden v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. RoperMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. State v. GuentherSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
  3. Pantoja v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
  4. State v. LongSupreme Court of Missouri · 2004
  5. Thompson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2018

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API