Legal Opinion

State v. Loose

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 2000No. 981726PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Justice:.

¶ 1 William Jesse Loose (“Loose”) appeals his conviction on two counts of sodomy on a child and two counts of sexual abuse of a child. Loose raises several arguments on appeal. He argues that the trial court erred by denying him a new trial based on: (i) the admission of improper hearsay and profile evidence offered by a therapist who had treated the victim, J.J.; (ii) the admission of hearsay evidence offered by J.J.; (iii) the exclusion of relevant defense evidence concerning the relationship between Loose and his wife; and (iv) the discovery after trial of new evidence.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. HamiltonUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. VerdeUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. RimmaschUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. JamesUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. State v. LitherlandUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. KelleyUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. PinderUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. LaffertyUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. MontoyaUtah Supreme Court · 2004

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API