Legal Opinion
Marino v. Nevitt
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 2, 1963No. 13972PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM F. SMITH, Circuit Judge.
The original complaint in this action is in one count and states a single claim for damages based on the alleged tortious conduct of the defendants. This complaint, although inartistically drawn, sufficiently alleges that the defendants, pursuant to an unlawful conspiracy and in furtherance of a scheme to defraud: injured the plaintiff in his business, divested him of his interest in three separate contracts, and deprived him of personal property consisting of certain motor equipment. The contracts were with the Boroughs of West Homestead, White Oak and Forest…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Nicola Panichella v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, (Warner Brothers Pictures, Inc., a Corporation)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
- Sandor Schwartz v. Cyrus S. Eaton, Walter J. Tuohy, and Cyrus S. Eaton, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Gold Seal Co. v. Weeks, Secretary of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Biro v. SchombertCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Paul E. Repass v. Albert L. Vreeland and Leonard G. Brown, Individuals, and Vreeland & Brown, a New Jersey Partnership in the Practice of LawCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
- Cohen v. Board Of Trustees Of The University Of Medicine And Dentistry Of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Planning Board v. MortimerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.