Legal Opinion

Bramlett v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 11, 1970No. 45,601PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fromme, J.:

This action was brought by an insured father and daughter against their insurance company on the medical payments coverage provided in their automobile policies. The case was submitted on a stipulation of facts and on opposing motions for summary judgment. Judgment was entered in favor of the insurance company and this appeal followed.

The daughter, Carol B. Bramlett, a minor, resides with her father, Robert L. Bramlett. The father owns a 1964 Pontiac automobile and a 1956 Ford pickup truck. These vehicles were insured by State Farm Mutual…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cook v. Suburban Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1964
  2. Lavin Ex Rel. Lavin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  3. Saul v. Saint Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  4. Continental Casualty Co. v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  5. Carey v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1965

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. First Financial Insurance v. BuggSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  2. Westchester Fire Ins. Co. v. City of Pittsburg, Kan.District Court, D. Kansas · 1991
  3. American Media, Inc. v. Home Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  4. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. HorinekSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  5. Mah v. United States Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API