Legal Opinion

Continental Casualty Co. v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 21, 1967No. 44,600PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Schroeder, J.:

This is an action between two insurance companies to settle their differences arising out of an automobile accident which killed Robert M. Kiker resulting in claims against his estate. The Continental Casualty Company (plaintiff-appellant) contends that its insurance was excess, and that the Employers Mutual Casualty Company (defendant-appellee) was primarily liable. The trial court held to the contrary.

The question presented on appeal is whether the 1962 Chevrolet station wagon under the stipulated facts replaced the 1958 Cadillac…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Merchants Mutual Casualty Co. v. LambertSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1940
  2. Maryland Indemnity & Fire Insurance Exchange v. SteersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  3. National Indemnity Co. v. GiampapaWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. MastSuperior Court of Delaware · 1959

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Grant v. Emmco InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Bramlett v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  3. Bjork v. Dairyland Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  4. Beck Motors, Inc. v. Federal Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Ranger Insurance v. Air-Speed, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API