Legal Opinion

Mah v. United States Fire Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 24, 1976No. 47,792PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Miller, J.:

This is an action by a policyholder against an insurance company for breach of a fire and extended coverage policy, insuring his mobile home, which was damaged in transit. Wing Mah, the plaintiff-appellant, is the policyholder. The United States Fire Insurance Company, defendant-appellee, wrote the policy. The trial court determined certain questions of law, and then sustained the company’s motion for summary judgment. The policyholder appeals.

We are concerned here with an insuring agreement and not with an exclusion. The insuring clause on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Goforth v. Franklin Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  2. Bramlett v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  3. Clark v. Prudential Insurance Co., of AmericaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  4. Simpson v. KFB Insurance Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1972

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. American Media, Inc. v. Home Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  2. Penalosa Cooperative Exchange v. Farmland Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1990
  3. Dronge v. Monarch Ins. Co. of OhioDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1979
  4. City of Salina, Kan. v. Maryland Cas. Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1994
  5. Federal Kemper Life Assurance Co. v. EllisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API